![]() ![]() With a $60 MSRP, you really can't ask for anything more. Good lockdown at all times, but it runs large On a positive note, the midsole experiences a comparatively lesser increase of 24.5% in firmness, which is better than the median. It stiffens up by a staggering 70.8%, surpassing the average of 45.6%. Regrettably, the performance of the Runfalcon 2.0 in cold temperatures is underwhelming when it comes to flexibility. However, what occurs when we let the shoe chill in our freezer for 20 minutes? ![]() Requiring only 19.5N of force to bend it to 90 degrees, the Runfalcon 2.0 proves to be more flexible than 89% of shoes. This video represents only one of our measurements. Quite the contrary, as demonstrated in the video below, it's funny to witness how they almost flip!ĭisclaimer: We take an average of 4 measurements and disregard any outliers. Lastly, as a budget-friendly daily trainer, don't anticipate a rockered ride with these kicks. With only 17.8 mm of stack height in the forefoot, a softer foam will undoubtedly make the shoe "bottom out".Īdidas went with a 28.7-mm stack height in the heel, resulting in a steep 10.9-mm heel-to-toe drop. With that said, is not a bad thing that this shoe is on the firm side. We measured the midsole at 27.8 HA, which correlates pretty well with everyone's feelings. The photo above shows just one measurement. And if you feel that the Runfalcon 2.0 are not enough, check the Nike Pegasus 40.ĭisclaimer: We do 4 measurements and exclude any outliers. That just doesn't exist.įor beginners without much knowledge of advanced shoe technologies, these shoes are OK for their everyday runs. Your browser does not support the video tag.īut let's be realistic-we can't expect top-notch performance from a budget-friendly shoe. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |